Malignant Lymphomas |
1 Division of Molecular Histopathology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
2 Divisions of Anatomic Pathology and Hematopathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
3 Department of Histopathology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Correspondence: Ming-Qing Du, Professor of Oncological Pathology, Division of Molecular Histopathology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Box 231, Level 3, Lab block, Addenbrookes Hospital Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom. Tel: +44.1223.767092. Fax: +44.1223. 586670. Email: mqd20{at}cam.ac.uk
|
|
|---|
Deregulation of BCL6 expression by chromosome translocation and somatic mutation of its 5 non-coding region is one of the most common molecular events in B-cell lymphomagenesis. BCL6 translocations involve not only immunoglobulin genes but also a number of non-immunoglobulin gene loci, and can occur either as a primary or secondary genetic event, largely depending on the lymphoma subtypes. These translocations bring the coding region of BCL6 under the transcriptional control of the heterologous promoters and enhancer elements of its translocation partner genes. BCL6 translocations are frequently seen in nodal diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) and in grade 3 follicular lymphomas.1,2 At extranodal sites, BCL6 translocations have been reported in 50% of gastric DLBCL with a residual MALT lymphoma.3 Such translocations have also been reported in a few cases of MALT lymphoma/marginal B cell lymphoma of the stomach,4 small intestine,5 Waldeyers ring, and liver.6 However, the true incidence of BCL6 translocation in MALT lymphoma of various sites is unknown. We investigated the presence of BCL6 translocations in 392 cases of MALT lymphoma of the stomach (n=135), lung (n=80), salivary gland (n=63), ocular adnexa (n=57), skin (n=27), thyroid (n=15), liver (n=6) and intestine (n=9), using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded whole tissue sections (306 cases) or tissue microarray slides (86 cases). All cases were screened using a BCL6 dual-colour break-apart probe (Abbott Laboratories Ltd, Maidenhead, United Kingdom). The positive cases were further examined for chromosome translocations involving some or all of the IGH, MALT1, BCL10 and BCL2 loci using the respective dual-colour break-apart probes, and for IGH-BCL6 translocations using an in-house dual-color fusion probe. The cases positive for BCL6 translocation were subjected to thorough review of histology and immunophenotype.
Seven cases (1.8%) with typical histologic and immunophenotypic features of MALT lymphoma were found to harbour a BCL6-involved chromosome translocation (Supplement table 1, Figure 1). These cases arose at various extranodal sites and none showed evidence of transformation. Of these BCL6 translocation-positive cases, 4 (cases 2, 5–7) showed evidence of a breakage at the IGH locus and further FISH with a dual-colour fusion probe confirmed IGH-BCL6 fusion, suggesting the presence of a t(3;14)(q27;q32). Long distance PCR for the IGH-BCL6 genomic fusion was performed in case 5 where high molecular weight DNA was available,7 and the results showed that BCL6 was fused to the IGH switch region. None of the 6 cases examined showed evidence of chromosome translocations involving the MALT1 locus. Bcl10 immunohistochemistry was carried out in 6 cases and none of them showed the strong nuclear positivity seen in cases harbouring a BCL10 translocation. The remaining case showed no evidence of a BCL10 translocation by FISH (Supplement table 1).
![]() View larger version (78K): [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Figure 1. All cases showed the typical morphologic features of MALT lymphoma. Low and high power views of case 6 (A, thyroid) and case 7 (B, lung) are shown. All cases showed a BCL6 translocation by interphase FISH using a BCL6 break-apart probe (C). Case 1 (stomach) contained BCL6-positive, CD10-negative MALT lymphoma cells, particularly around lymphoepithelial lesions (D, H&E; E, BCL6 immunostaining; F, CD10).
|
The present study provides further evidence for the existence, although rare, of BCL6 translocations in MALT lymphomas. Based on the cases studied here, the BCL6 translocation-positive MALT lymphomas are indistinguishable from classic MALT lymphomas on both histologic and immunophenotypic grounds with the exception of BCL6 expression, which may be positive in cases with BCL6 translocation. The finding of a lack of BCL6 expression by immunohistochemistry in 5/7 cases of BCL6 translocation-positive MALT lymphoma is intriguing. However, negative BCL6 immunostaining has been well described in DLBCL and grade 3 follicular lymphomas carrying a BCL6 translocation.2,8,9 The reason for this is unclear. It is possible that in such cases the level of BCL6 protein expression is below the threshold detectable by immunohistochemistry, but studies have also shown a lack of correlation between BCL6 mRNA levels and BCL6 translocation status in such cases.10
Given that BCL6 is a protein of germinal centre B cells and is commonly expressed in germinal centre-derived lymphomas, it is interesting to find BCL6 translocations in MALT lymphomas, which originate from the post-germinal centre marginal zone B cells of acquired MALT. However, neither BCL6 translocation nor BCL6 protein expression is associated exclusively with lymphomas with a germinal centre B cell phenotype. For example, both are found frequently in activated B cell-like DLBCL, which show features of post-germinal centre B-cells, often undergoing plasmacytic differentiation.11 The finding of BCL6 translocations in different lymphoma subtypes deriving from B-cells at various stages of maturation is in keeping with the diverse functions of BCL6 during B cell development and differentiation. BCL6, a nuclear transcriptional repressor, plays important roles in regulating the differentiation, survival, proliferation and genetic stability of B-cells. Through these properties, in combination with the effects of other genetic changes, BCL6 is believed to contribute to lymphoma development.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. D. Sjo, S. Heegaard, J. U. Prause, B. L. Petersen, S. Pedersen, and E. Ralfkiaer Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma in the Ocular Region: Clinical, Immunophenotypical, and Cytogenetical Characteristics Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 516 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||